2 years ago

Hepatic and renal improvements with FXR agonist vonafexor in individuals with suspected fibrotic NASH

Hepatic and renal improvements with FXR agonist vonafexor in individuals with suspected fibrotic NASH
Vlad Ratziu, Stephen A. Harrison, Veronique Loustaud-Ratti, Christophe Bureau, Eric Lawitz, Manal Abdelmalek, Naim Alkhouri, Sven Francque, Hugo Girma, Raphael Darteil, Harold Couchoux, Myles Wolf, Arun Sanyal, Jacky Vonderscher, Pietro Scalfaro

Background & Aims

The LIVIFY trial investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy, of Vonafexor, a second-generation, non-bile acid farnesoid X receptor agonist in patients with suspected fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Methods

This double-blind phase 2a study was conducted in two parts. Patients were randomised (1:1:1:1) to receive placebo, Vonafexor 100 mg twice daily (VONA-100BID), Vonafexor 200 mg once daily (VONA-200QD), or 400 mg Vonafexor QD (VONA-400QD) in Part A (safety run-in, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics) or placebo, Vonafexor 100 mg QD (VONA-100QD), or VONA-200QD (1:1:1) in Part B. Efficacy endpoints were reduction in liver fat content (LFC) from baseline to Week 12 by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF, primary), imaging biomarker of fibrotic steatohepatitis (corrected T1 signal), and liver enzymes.

Results

One hundred and twenty patients were randomised (Part A, n=24; Part B, n=96). In Part B, there was a significant reduction in least-square mean (SE) absolute change in LFC from baseline to Week 12 for VONA-100QD, (-6.3% [0.9]), VONA-200QD (-5.4% [0.9]), versus placebo (-2.3% [0.9], p=0.002 and 0.012, respectively). A >30% relative LFC reduction was achieved by 50.0% and 39.3% of patients in the VONA-100QD and VONA-200QD arms, respectively, but only in 12.5% in the placebo arm. Reductions in body weight, liver enzymes, and corrected T1 were also observed with Vonafexor. Creatinine based glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved in the active arms but not the placebo arm. Mild to moderate generalised pruritus was reported in 6.3%, 9.7%, and 18.2% of subjects in the placebo, VONA-100QD, and VONA-200QD arms, respectively.

Conclusions

In patients with suspected fibrotic NASH, Vonafexor was safe and induced potent liver fat reduction, improvement in liver enzymes, weight loss, and a possible renal benefit.

Clinical trial number (EudraCT)

2018-003119-22.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT03812029.

Impact and implications

NASH has become a leading cause for chronic liver disease and patients are also at higher risk for the development of chronic kidney disease. There are no approved therapies and only few options to treat this population. LIVIFY Phase 2a trial results show that single daily administration of oral Vonafexor, a FXR agonist, leads in the short term to a reduction in liver fat, liver enzymes, fibrosis biomarkers, body weight and abdominal circumference, and a possible improvement in kidney function, while possible mild moderate pruritus (a peripheral FXR class effect) and an LDL-Cholesterol increase are manageable with lower doses and statins. These results support exploration in longer and larger trials to ultimately provide therapies for the unmet medical need in NASH.

Open access
You might also like
Discover & Discuss Important Research

Keeping up-to-date with research can feel impossible, with papers being published faster than you'll ever be able to read them. That's where Researcher comes in: we're simplifying discovery and making important discussions happen. With over 19,000 sources, including peer-reviewed journals, preprints, blogs, universities, podcasts and Live events across 10 research areas, you'll never miss what's important to you. It's like social media, but better. Oh, and we should mention - it's free.

  • Download from Google Play
  • Download from App Store
  • Download from AppInChina

Researcher displays publicly available abstracts and doesn’t host any full article content. If the content is open access, we will direct clicks from the abstracts to the publisher website and display the PDF copy on our platform. Clicks to view the full text will be directed to the publisher website, where only users with subscriptions or access through their institution are able to view the full article.